Skills Mentoring IT Support Technician Level

Question: Talk about the Skills Mentoringfor IT Support Technician Level. Answer: Presentation Work place coaches can assume a significant job in the underlying period of business and tutors positively affect the expert improvement of adolescents. Coaching prompts sensational improvement in effectiveness and efficiency of work and move of uncommon fields information starting with one age then onto the next. Consequently, proficient coaching administration can go about as a significant apparatus to support and build up the individuals in the activity (Ghosh and Reio 2013). I have been recently utilized as an IT bolster specialist level 1. On the off chance that I likewise get coaching administration at my working environment, it would assist me with progressing in my profession. My own testament and the experience may not be sufficient to advance in my vocation, extra understanding from the specialists in the field would assist me with improving my expert aptitudes. Tutors can be important in the vocation way on the grounds that notwithstanding their expert ability they are connected to network of IT experts. They may be eager to share essential data which may help an IT expert to comprehend the business in a superior manner. New expert must remember this that coaching is two-way connection where tutor may be sharing data and the mentee additionally need to assist the guide with maintaining a harmonious relationship. In its field, a coach can give essential data with respect to the most recent innovation which is drifting or what extra course may help the mentee to be work as per the necessities of the organization (Eller et al. 2014). Reference Eller, L.S., Lev, E.L. what's more, Feurer, A., 2014. Key segments of a successful coaching relationship: A subjective study.Nurse instruction today,34(5), pp.815-820. Ghosh, R. what's more, Reio, T.G., 2013. Profession benefits related with tutoring for guides: A meta-analysis.Journal of Vocational Behavior,83(1), pp.106-116.

The Cask of Amontillado Essay -- Literary Analysis, Allan Poes

In Edgar Allan Poe’s â€Å"The Cask of Amontillado,† the primary character, Montresor, drives his foe, Fortunato, into his tombs, and there covers him alive by bricking him up in a specialty in the divider; Poe gives no genuine explanation behind this but to state that Montresor has been â€Å"insulted† somehow or another. In his Science Fiction work â€Å"Usher II,† Ray Bradbury embraces huge numbers of Poe’s works in making his storyâ€including pieces from â€Å"TCoA.† What isolates Bradbury’s work from different creators who acquire works and reconsider them (Gregory Maguire’s Wicked, Geraldine Brooks’s March, and Peter Carrey’s Jack Maggs, for example), is that â€Å"Usher II,† in its inventive way, is attempting to be unified with its forerunner. Bradbury looks to hold Poe’s love of the twofold and the clandestine (Gothic attitudes where the peruser is intended to be somewhat dubious about wha t they’re perusing and what’s going on) while including, most outstandingly in regards to â€Å"TCoA,† the things Poe never had a lot of care for: a start, an end, and reasonâ€thus making â€Å"Usher II† a reverence to Poe’s work, however a friend piece whose pulsating heart exists in the first work. Poe, as indicated by Professor Epstein of the Queens College English Department, composed for the peak, got you there, and afterward left; instances of this can be found in â€Å"The Black Cat† and â€Å"The Tell-Tale Heart,† where Poe removes directly before the cops are going to slap the chains on the storytellers, and, as will be represented underneath, in â€Å"TCoA.† In â€Å"The Philosophy of Composition,† Poe composes, in regards to the structure of his accounts, â€Å"It is just with the end result [the last disclosure demonstrating the result, or unfastening, of the plot] continually in see that we can give a plot its fundamental demeanor of outcome, or causation, by mama... ...has taken Poe’s â€Å"TCoA† entire, similarly for what it's worth, and made it his own by tinkering at the edges, giving it a start, and, on the grounds that the principle character has comprehensible explanations behind doing what he’s doing, an appropriate end that doesn’t leave the peruser feeling as though they’ve been pushed to the highest point of a mountain and afterward left there to get down themselves. In â€Å"Usher II,† Bradbury takes Poe’s covered figures and lifts them for the peruser (notwithstanding the characters, who need to kick the bucket since they aren’t acquainted with Poe). Bradbury hasn’t taken Poe’s work, nor has he adjusted its impact; he has, rather, added his own guileful imagination to an ace storyteller’s work by clarifying upon what was at that point there. I imagine that even Poe, who so esteemed inventiveness, would have been interested by Bradbury’s retelling of h is work. (Either that, or lead him down into some dull and dusty sepulchers.)

H I C C U P S

H I C C U P S A few Fridays ago, I sat down (as I normally do at the end of a long and tiring week) to watch a Bollywood film. All I was really looking for was a good-old three hours of minimal brain activity and the occasional musical sequence. When my younger brother hit the play button, I was already half-asleep. It’s been a while since a movie has kept me up past my internally strict bedtime. It’s been even longer since a movie has lingered with me past a good night’s sleep. Hichki (which roughly translates to hiccup in English), however, has had me scrambled in thoughts for days now. And as I’ve navigated my way through those dangerous waters, I like to think I’ve approached something meaningful. (might want to turn on english subtitles for this) In short, the film follows Naina Mathur, an aspiring teacher with some pretty heavy baggage: Tourette syndrome. A nervous system disorder in nature, Tourette’s causes her to make uncontrollable noises and movement. For a career as speech-dependent as education, Naina’s disorder serves as as big of a “hiccup” as she’ll find on her path to fulfill her dreams. But things always work out. And they work out for her as well, in a rather unconventional way. In a interesting turn of events, Naina is hired by her own alma mater to take on the disdained responsibility of teaching a group of 9th grade misfits. A group of low-income kids with both zero motivation and the potential to redirect their lives. The film in its entirety spews with messages of all kind. Messages about self-confidence. About perseverance. About redefining yourself. But there’s one message in particular that sticks out. In addressing her students wasted potential, Naina unfolds the following sequence of dialogue: “Ravinder, you can do calculations in your head that the average person needs a calculator for. And yet you fail in Math. You have a gift, so use it wisely. You want to bet? But bet legally. Not streetside gambling, but the largest level of gambling in the world: the stock market. Who knows? You might become a big investment banker.” “Killam, you repair bike tires right? Why does a car go faster in 4th gear than 2nd gear? (student replies about the difference in friction) That’s physics!” “Tammanah, when do you add salt to your okra? At the beginning? Or the end? (student replies that she adds salt at the end to prevent okra from getting watery). Adding salt releases moisture in anything, that’s chemistry!” “If you ask me, you’re all experts of your own subjects. But there’s one more thing you all are also masters of-blaming your situations.”   BUT THERE’S ONE MORE THING, YOU ALL ARE ALSO MASTERS OF-BLAMING YOUR SITUATIONS. Call me crazy for having that line on constant repeat for weeks now, but there’s a level of raw truth in that statement. A kind of truth that I think we all should be able to and absolutely need to recognize. We’re all products of our environment. And more often than not, we use our environments as excuses for our shortcomings. Our own personal journeys of self-growth and self-development stand permanently at the yield sign. Because hey, we were born that way. Or we were raised that way. Or we didn’t know better. Or that was how things were going to play out anyways. And frankly that’s the saddest form of failure there is. To retreat and helplessly accept the way things are. Don’t get me wrong, our environments are critical to who become. But because we never fully get to pick the environments we grow in, we take it for granted. We don’t take advantage of our environments but let our environments take advantage of us. There is a quote that goes something like “when a flower doesn’t bloom, you fix the environment, not the flower.” And while I’ve always found value in those words, I don’t entirely agree anymore. Our environments and experiences in life make us who we are in the most basic way possible. By “changing environments” we somehow recognize that the environment wasn’t good for is in the first place. But it’s not that simple. Fortunate experiences set the bar high, forcing us to stay with par. Less fortunate experiences set the bar low, pushing us to want better. The environments we live in ultimately help us grow into our skins. Good or bad. So I disagree. I don’t think a flower fails to bloom because of the environment. But because it fails to take something away from that environment. For the students in Hichki, it’s not their slum lives that ill-prepared them for life, but their inability to see what they had learned from it. At the end of the dialogue, Naina has her students write down all of their fears, all of the things that are holding them back. They then fold their sheets into airplanes and make their way out to easily the most beautiful scene of the film. Standing side by side on the school terrace, fears and confusions in mind, the students throw their planes far into the sky. Because our environments and situations can become the reason to fly, if we let them. We all have our own hiccups in life. Our own Tourette’s. Our own street-side gambling. Bike repairs. Okras. What are my hichkis? I stem from a community that hesitates to send their girls far. I let things slide because I hate confrontation. My acne has been scratching at my self-confidence for YEARS. I think that the answer to a bad day is isolating myself till it’s time to sleep. I repetitively associate my self-worth with how people perceive me. And so the list goes on. But with each hiccup, we fold another paper airplane. We learn something new about who we are. About where we come from. And what all we are capable of in moving forward. So grab a cup of *water* and take a seat. Because I want to know what your hichkis are. And maybe. Just maybe. If we start talking about our hiccups, well become better because of it. p.s. this post would not be complete without saying that Rani Mukherjee is a literal queen Post Tagged ##Bollywood ##Education #Learning From Life

The Seven Early Kings of Rome

An Analysis of Mandatory Injunctions - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 10 Words: 3050 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Law Essay Type Analytical essay Did you like this example? (ii) Mandatory Injunction: A mandatory injunction may be defined as an order of the court not only restraining a person from further wrongful acts but directing him further to restore, as far as possible, the former state of things. A mandatory injunction not only in involves prohibition but also imposes a positive duty on the defendant to do something. According to section 39 when in order to prevent the breach of obligation, it is necessary to compel the performance of certain acts, which the court is capable of enforcing , the court may, in its discretion, grant an injunction to prevent breach complained of also to compel performance of the requisite acts. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "An Analysis of Mandatory Injunctions" essay for you Create order Under section 40, the plaintiff in a suit for perpetual or mandatory injunction can also claim damages either in addition to, or in substitution of, such injunction. The Court may in its discretion, award damages. The court under section 42 may grant an injunction restraining the breach of a negative contract, express or implied in those cases where according to clause (e) of section 41 an injunction cannot be granted to prevent the breach of a contract, the performance of which could not be specifically enforced. Therefore, where there is an affirmative agreement to do certain act, coupled with a negative agreement, express or implied, not to do certain act, and the court cannot compel the specific performance of the affirmative agreement, it can still grant an injunction to perform the negative agreement. An injunction is a discretionary remedy, but the discretion must be supplied judicially. But it is necessary that plaintiff must be aggrieved person. In Veish Degree College v. Lakshmi Narain, the Supreme Court observed: The relief of injunction is purely discretionary. The plaintiff cannot claim it as a matter of right; It is more in the nature of equitable relief than a legal remedy. The Court grants the relief according to the legal principles. The Court must keep in mind the principles of justice and fair play. In this case, the court refused to grant the relief to the plaintiff-teacher as it was a matter of employer-employee relationship, even though it was regulated by the statute, it would have caused undue hardship to the college authorities. The court saves monetary compensation to the plaintiff. The decision of the court is coloured by the private law approach that a service contract is not specifically enforceable. But this approach should not apply when there is some statutory protection given to the employee or when there is element of public employment in service contract. In Montogemery Municipality v. Sant Singh, the municipal committee imposed a tax on a person on whom it could not be imposed under the Municipal Act. The aggrieved person invoke the relief of injunction, as there was no â€Å"other usual mode of proceeding† available to him which could be considered to be â€Å"equally efficacious†. According to Section 41, an injunction cannot be granted: To restrain a person form prosecuting a judicial proceeding pending at the institution of the suit in which injunction is sought unless such restraint is necessary to prevent a multiplicity of proceedings; To restrain a person from instituting or prosecuting proceedings in a court not subordinate to that from which an injunction is sought; To restrain persons from applying to any legislative body; To restrain a person from prosecuting proceedings in a criminal matter; To restrain the breach of contract for personal service; To prevent an Act on the ground of nuisance, where the nuisance is of too light in nature or consists only of trifling inconvenience; Where the conduct of the plaintiff or his agent is such as to disentitle him to the assistance of the court; Where the plaintiff has no personal interest in the matter. The Constitution (Forty Second Amendment) Act, 1976 has curtailed the power of High Court under Article 226 in matters of making interim orders whether by an injunction or stay or in any manner. The High Court could not issue interim orders whether by an injunction or stay or in any manner. The High Court could not issue interim order by way of injunction or otherwise unless the opportunity was given to the other party to be heard except in exceptional circumstances for reason to be recorded in writing. Even in such exceptional circumstances, the order ceased to have effect on the expiry of 14 days from the date on which it was made, unless before the expiry of this period the other party had been heard. Clause (6) of 42nd Amendment had imposed a ban on interim orders if it had the effect of delaying an enquiry into any matter of public importance, or any offence punishable with imprisonment, or any execution of any project of public utility, or any requisition of property by the g overnment. But these restrictions were removed by the 44th Amendment. Now, under Article 226 the High Court shall have power to issue ex-parte interim orders, whether by way of injunction or stay or in any other manner. However, the court shall have to decide the matter within a period of two weeks from the date when the application for the vacation of the order is made or received whichever is later, failing which such order shall stand vacated. Injunction is an effective method to control administrative action where the authority has acted without jurisdiction, or has abused its jurisdiction or has violated the principles of natural justice. It is also an effective mode to control the exercise of administrative discretion. Therefore, if the administrative authority has not exercised its discretion at all or has exercised it at the discretion of some other body or it is arbitrary, or has exercised an extraneous consideration, or for an improper purpose, or where its exercise is mala fide, injunction would lie. Both injunction and writ of mandamus are similar in many aspects. Both are discretionary remedies (except in cases of infringement of fundamental rights, the High Court under Article 226 and the Supreme Court under Art 32 of the Constitution) and cannot be claimed as of right. However, there are some differences between both the remedies. A suit for injunction is filed in the District Court but a petition for mandamus is moved to a High Court or Supreme Court. The remedy of injunction is less expensive and within the approach of ordinary citizens whereas the writ of mandamus is more expensive and may be beyond the reach of many citizens. Oral evidences are taken by the courts in suit for injunction, whereas in a petition for mandamus, the High Courts are generally adverse to investigate the disputed questions of facts by taking evidence. Thus the scope of judicial scrutiny is greater in suit of injunction. In injunction, a claim for damages may also be combined but in a petition of mandamus, may also be combined but in a petition of mandamus, the question of awarding damages does not arise. Mandamus is a constitutional remedy which cannot be excluded by any statute whereas the injunction is a statutory remedy and a statute can bar the courts from entertaining the suits for injunctions. No formality is required in filing a suit for injunction under section 80 of C.P.C. The requirement of prescribed procedure under section 80 of C.P.C. has been lessened by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1976. Now, the suit of â€Å"an urgent or immediate relief† against the Government or a public officer can be filed, with the leave of the court, without serving any notice. The remedy of mandamus is regarded as more effective and popular remedy. The District Courts take longer time in disposing of case, whereas the High Court disposes of the matter comparatively expeditiously. (B) Declaratory Action A declar atory action signifies a judicial remedy, which conclusively determines the rights of the parties. It does not prescribe any further relief nor any sanction against the defendant. In a declaratory action, there is no direct order against anyone or in favour of anyone but only the definition of rights and obligation of the parties. It removes existing doubts regarding the legal rights of the plaintiff. The essence of the declaratory judgment is that it states the right or legal position of the parties as they stand, without altering them in any way though it may be supplemented by the other remedies in suitable cases. A declaratory judgement by itself merely states same existing legal situation. It requires no one to do anything and to disregard it will not amount to contempt by court. A declaratory judgment differs from other judicial orders as it declares the law without pronouncing any sanction directed against the defendant. In many cases, there may be genuine doubts about the legal rights. In case of public authorities, such doubts may put them in a dilemma for doing the acts might entail ultra vires and no doing may amount omission. Declaration by a court is a most flexible remedy and gives the court a wide discretion. Declaration by a court is a most flexible remedy and gives the court a wide discretion. The court may grant declaration in lieu of an injunction or may award a declaration to the plaintiff where he has unsuccessfully sued for damages in tort and had not asked for declaratory relief. A declaration action is governed by section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, read with section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Section 34 of Specific Relief Act say – Any person entitled to any legal character, or to any right as to any property, may institute a suit against any person denying or is interested to deny, his title to such character or right and the court may in its discretion make therein a declaration that he is entitled and the p laintiff need not in such suit ask further relief. Provided that no court shall make any such declaration where the plaintiff, being able to seek further relief than a mere declaration of title, omits to do so. The court will not grant a declaration where the plaintiff is capable of seeking a further relief. But where the plaintiff is not entitled to further consequent relief on account of some legal bar or circumstances beyond his control, the court may grant such relief. As provided under section 55 of the Specific Relief Act, declaration made by the court is binding only on the parties to the suit and persons claiming through them. A declaratory decree made under section 34 does not operate in rem. Section 34 and 35 are co-extensive in their operation. The declaratory decree is intended to avoid chances of future litigation by removing existing course of controversy. A declaratory action is particularly useful where a legal dispute exists but no positive wrong has been c ommitted or taken place entitling a party to claim coercive relief. But a declaratory action is not based merely on hypothetical question, there must exist some genuine dispute. In Sarat Chandra Das v. Anukul Chandra Mukherji, Justice Mukherji observed, No declaration can possibly be made on the basis of chance or mere hope entertained by the plaintiff, but a person having even a contingent right in a property may sue for a declaration through the court in the exercise of its discretion may refuse to make such declaration, if it considers the claim to be too remote or that the declaration given would be ineffectual and absorative. The question, therefore, really is not jurisdiction but one of discretion to be exercised by the court. Prior to the Constitution, a suit for declaration with or without injunction was practically the only form of judicial review available against the government. But after the Constitution, notwithstanding the flexibility and other advantages of a decla ratory action, its use against governmental action has been substantially replaced by the writs under Article 32 and 226. It is now settled that, apart from a suit, declaratory relief may be obtained in appropriate cases, in a proceeding under Article 32 and 226. Apart from Section 34 of Specific Act, 1963, it is usual for the courts to pass declaratory orders whereby they declare an administrative action, rule or statute ultra vires without giving further relief in writ petitions under Article 32 and 226. Conditions for grant of declaration 1.Plaintiff must be entitled to a legal character or a right to any property: The word legal character may include every jural relationship of an individual which is recognized by law. Legal character is equivalent to legal status which may include official position, sex, profession, marital status, minority, legitimacy, nationality, franchise, etc. The word right to property may include any right which is not a mere hope or chance or whic h is not contractual in nature. The word right includes both liability and immunity. Therefore, it would be possible for a person to obtain a declaration to the effect that a certain statute does not apply to him. A suit for declaration would also lie to the effect that an order compulsorily retiring the plaintiff is illegal and ultra vires. In the same way, where the Board of Revenue covered the order of supervision into demission in revisions, it would hold that the plaintiff could sue for a declaration that the Boards order was without jurisdiction. When the services of a civil servant has been terminated in violation of any statutory or constitutional provision i.e. Article 311 of the Constitution, he may obtain a declaration from the Civil Court that the order purporting to dismiss the plaintiff was void and inoperative and that the plaintiff remained a member of the service at the date of institution of his suit. A declaration may be sought in respect of a right to prope rty. Thus, the plaintiff, the owner of land, can sue the defendant, who claims to use the land as his own or as a public road. It is essential that the plaintiff must show in him a present existing interest in the property, however, distant the possibility of its coming into actual possession and enjoyment may be. In Dumpala Ramchandra Reddi v. Dumpala Kanta Reddi, Andhra Pradesh High Court has observed, Under section 34, any person entitled to legal character or a right to any property can institute a declaratory suit against another denying, or interested to deny, his title to such character or right and he will be declared so entitled only if he is incompetent to seek for any further relief, it would not be competent for him to seek only for the declaratory relief. And he will seek any further relief in addition to the declaration only against the same defendant. 2. There must be some danger or detriment to such right: There must be some person or authority denying or inter ested to deny such character or hypothetical because the courts dont act as right. The court can refuse to grant declaration if the question is of advisory bodies. It is essential that some genuine dispute should exist, though no violation of the rights of either party may have taken place. 3.Plaintiff must seek further relief: Where the plaintiff is entitled to consequential relief and does not claim it, the court will not grant declaration. The relief provided for in the section 34 does not mean every kind of relief but one which would complete the claim of the plaintiff and not lead to multiplicity of suit. The relief ought to flow necessarily from the effect of the declaration and should be available in some proceedings. But if the relief is remote and not connected with the cause of action then the plaintiff need not claim it. The relief should be appropriate to and consequent on, the right asserted or denied. A suit for declaration is liable to be thrown out if the conseque nt relief which the plaintiff can claim is not claimed though the court may permit the plaintiff to amend the plaint. Whether the consequent relief has been claimed or not depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case. A suit for declaration may be thrown out if the plaintiff has not asked for consequent relief besides declaration. If the consequent relief is not claimed then the court would not entertain the suit for declaration. Where in a suit a relief was confined only to declaration for reinstatement in service of the State Government, it was held in such proceedings, arrears of salary and other consequential relief could not be granted. The Law Commission expressed the opinion that the proviso to section 34 should be abolished. It observed, The proviso was introduced by the Specific Relief Act with the object of preventing multiplicity of proceedings. The proviso has, however, given rise to a mass of case law as to what is further relief and whether further relief i s such relief as would be sought for in the suit in which as in the court before which the declaration sought. It leads to injustice in many cases and it only results in addition to the revenue to a certain extent. The recommendation of the Law Commission was not implemented when the Specific Relief Act, 1963 was enacted. If the proviso to section 34 is modified as the Law Commission suggested, declaration may come to serve as a useful remedy in administrative law as an alternative to writs. Until a case is decided there is often uncertain whether the plaintiff could have claimed the consequential relief or not. The role of declaratory action in Public Law as a mean of judicial review of administrative action is not appreciatable in India. It is largely utilized as a mode to regulate private relationship than the relationship between administration and citizens. But it does not mean that the use of declaratory action in public law is wholly absent. In cases where the administr ative authorities lacks, exceeds or abuses jurisdiction or violates the principles of natural justice, then the declaratory action provides the required relief. In Veruareddi Ramaraghana Reddy v. Kenduru Seshu Reddy, the Supreme Court granted declaration for the enforcement of Public Law. Declaration and injunction may be proper relief in a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution. Declaration is a discriminatory remedy and may be refused if it would be anfractuous as if an adequate alternative exists or on other equitable consideration. A declaration is not granted when it has no utility. The court refused to grant declaration that the grant of such relief was a matter of courts judicial discretion

Carter’s Economic Policies Led to Savings and Loan Failure Free Essays

The Savings and Loan crisis of the late 1980’s and early 1990’s cost approximately $160 billion, out of which the American taxpayer shouldered in excess of $120 billion in Government bailout measures. The huge budget deficits that resulted can only be compared to the current global economic crisis. However, the genesis of the S L crisis can be traced back to the failed economic policies of President Jimmy Carter. We will write a custom essay sample on Carter’s Economic Policies Led to Savings and Loan Failure or any similar topic only for you Order Now When Jimmy Carter took over as president in 1979, he inherited an economy in recession. Oil prices were high, unemployment and incomes were low. In order to stimulate the economy, he proposed to increase government spending and introduce tax cuts, but withdrew the former and vetoed the latter when interest rates continued to rise. Instead, when inflation peaked in 1978, the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, Paul Volcker, initiated policies to tame inflation by reducing the money supply and increasing interest rates. However, these measures had a negative effect and inflation skyrocketed, unemployment reached 11 percent, accompanied by a prime rate of 21. 5 percent (Federal Deposit Insurance Coorporation, 2006). In this climate, the savings and loan institutions could not survive. They were now confronted with asset-liability-mismatches where the costs they were incurring on short term funding were higher than the returns they were getting on fixed-rate-mortgages. Additionally, the passage of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act, introduced risks and opportunities which the S L’S were not qualified to administer. Inevitably, many S L’s began to go under. In retrospect, Jimmy Carter’s policies should have focused on lowering interest rates and possibly left the money markets as they were. Read also Analyze the Ways in Which British Imperial Policies References Federal Deposit Insurance Coorporation (2006, February). The 1970’s. Retrieved on July 27, 2009 from http://www.fdic.gov/about/learn/learning/when/1970s.html How to cite Carter’s Economic Policies Led to Savings and Loan Failure, Papers

Digital Single Market Open Net Neutrality †Myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Digital Single Market Open Net Neutrality? Answer: Intrroducation IT ethics is the branch of the ethical studies which focuses on ethical behavior in the realm of computer technology. It refers to the ethical considerations regarding the social impact of computer technology. It is a new branch of ethical studies and pertains to the development and justification of ethical theories in the cyberspace. The computer ethics refers to the personal and social impact of computer technology for the development of ethical policies. The ethical theories assure that the IT professionals do not misuse their technological knowledge and skills. It is the practice of differentiating wrong and right in information technology (Birsch, 2013). Currently, the issue of net neutrality has garnered the attention of several government and international agencies. A large number of multinational companies are trying to make alliance with the telecommunication network so that their traffic and websites become more accessible than their counterparts. The net neutrality is the principle which states that the government and the service providers should treat all the data on the internet as same and do not discriminate or charge differently for different applications. In 2015, the net neutrality rule was adopted all across the European Union. The EU net neutrality bill assures that all the websites can be accessed equally by the end-users and the distribution of the internet services remains impartial. However, there are several arguments against net neutrality which states that the large companies are already having significant advantage over smaller companies as they provide better services and have a higher bandwidth. It is also st ated that when the large companies increase their accessibility, it will increase the accessibility of the common man to the internet services. Net neutrality also increases unnecessary competition between the business organizations (European Commission, 2015). According to the utilitarian perspective, net neutrality can be categorized as an immoral action. Utilitarian philosophers states that the morality of an action can be judged according to its consequences on the public and different stakeholders. The basis of this philosophy is on the utility theory which judges an action according to its utility for the society (Donnelly, 2003). Accordingly, if an action has overall good outcomes on the society and the public, it can be categorized as a morally justified action. According to this theoretical perspective, net neutrality limits the access of the public to the internet websites. Currently, internet has emerged as an essential medium of communication and business (Dreier, 2009). The people having access to the internet are at advantage in comparison to other people. It could be stated that the increasing the access to some prominent websites will increase the accessibility of the common man to the internet. However, when examining the action with the deontological philosophy, it could be stated that the action is morally correct. This ethical theory states that a person must abide by law and rules irrespective of the situation. This ethical perspective gives least significance to the consequences of the action and states that a person must abide by the law. According to this theory, there are different cultures and each person follow different ethical principles. When a person follows a specific ethical perspective, he must abide by all of its rules. According to this theory, the people should have the freedom to access whichever website they want and should be able to access all the content without any restrictions (Farrell, 2010). The, laws of the net neutrality assures that the people can access all the websites equally. Moreover, it also provides equal opportunity to all the business organizations which is essential for the maintaining healthy competition to all the business organiz ations. Therefore, the action of the government to impose rules regarding net neutrality is morally justified when looking through the deontological perspective. The virtue ethics is another ethical perspective which states that a person judges an action according to his local environment and the upbringing. It emphasizes the role of the individual character and the virtues rather than the utility perspective and doing ones duty. The virtue ethics do not provide any guidance for the ethical behavior as it states that there is no other guidance rather than the ethical behavior (Garber, 2008). It does not emphasize the rules, consequences and particular acts; however, focuses on the virtue of a person who is acting. It emphasizes on the motives of acting person. When a person acts on virtue, he acts on a particular motivation (Waluvhow, 2003). It could be critiqued that the decision of net neutrality is based on the motivation to provide equal opportunities to all business organizations irrespective of their size. All the businesses will have similar access to their customers and other business and can grow their business in equal opportunity e nvironment. Likewise, the customers can also access the different internet content and websites (Haidt, 2012). They have the right to access whichever website and internet content they want. Therefore, the decision of the European Union to implement net neutrality rules in morally justified. The social contract theory states that the moral or the political obligation of a person is dependent upon the contract or agreement of the person with the society in which they live. The theory states that in a society, people live together by forming some agreements that establish moral and political rules (Jacobs, 2008). According to this theory, people behave in a specific way as they form social contracts with other members of the society and not because some other person is requesting it. The social contracts can be explicit or implicit, such as the constitution of a country is explicit example of social contract whereas manners and the social norms are the examples of the implicit social contract (Rawls, 2009). According to this theory, an individual has a right to access every website. The freedom of choice is the basic human right of the people. The people should have the choice and the freedom to access every website they want to approach (Melden 2013). Moreover, the giving preference to certain websites will hinder the progress of the small and the medium enterprises. It will impact negatively on the progress of the economy. Moreover, it will also reduce the chances of innovation and research and development. By hindering the progress of the small and medium enterprises, the government will also negatively impact on the employment of several people working in these organizations (Oxley, 2011). It can be concluded that the decision of the European Union to implement net neutrality in the region is ethical and morally correct. Giving preference to certain large business organizations will create obstacles for the growth of small and medium enterprises. It will also snatch away the basic human right of the people to access all the content published on the websites equally. When this ethical issue is examined from different ethical frameworks or theories, it was identified that the net neutrality decision is an ethical decision which promotes equality to all the stakeholders. The utilitarian perspective states that the morality of an action could be judged by its impact on society. According to this theory, the net neutrality is an immoral action as it hinders the accessibility of people to different internet sites. Other than that, other moral theories state exmines that the action is ethically correct References Birsch, D. (2013). Introduction to Ethical Theories: A Procedural Approach. Waveland Press. Donnelly, J. (2003). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Cornell University Press. Dreier, J. (2009). Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory. John Wiley Sons. Farrell, M. E. (2010). Ethics: A University Guide. Progressive Frontiers Pubs. Garber, P.R. (2008). The Ethical Dilemma. Human Resource Development. Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. Penguin UK. Jacobs, J. (2008). Dimensions of Moral Theory: An Introduction to Metaethics and Moral Psychology. John Wiley Sons. Melden A. (2013). Ethical Theories. Read Books Ltd. Oxley, J. (2011). The Moral Dimensions of Empathy: Limits and Applications in Ethical Theory and Practice. Springer. Rawls, J. (2009). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press. Waluvhow, W.J. (2003). The Dimensions of Ethics: An Introduction to Ethical Theory. Broadview Press. European Commission. (2015). Digital Single Market-open Net Neutrality. Retrieved 11 May 2017 from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/open-internet-net-neutrality